2012
DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-2723-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new data-processing method for SKYNET sky radiometer observations

Abstract: Abstract. In order to reduce uncertainty in the estimation of Direct Aerosol Radiative Forcing (DARF), it is important to improve the estimation of the single scattering albedo (SSA). In this study, we propose a new data processing method to improve SSA retrievals for the SKYNET sky radiometer network, which is one of the growing number of networks of sun-sky photometers, such as NASA AERONET and others. There are several reports that SSA values from SKYNET have a bias compared to those from AERONET, which is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), but showed a quite similar extended particle size range with larger concentrations in almost all channels except the extremes (not shown). The four other drifting balloons launched in the dust layer during this event on 17 and 19 June (Table 5) did confirm the presence of very large particles (> 20 µm), which cannot be reported by the AERONET particle size distribution retrieval algorithm (Hashimoto et al, 2012). In addition, observations of large particles (> 15 µm) were systematically found during all other LOAC balloon flights drifting in African dust layers, which will need further analysis to better understand the process that can maintain such large particles in suspension during several days.…”
Section: Columnar Particle Volume Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4), but showed a quite similar extended particle size range with larger concentrations in almost all channels except the extremes (not shown). The four other drifting balloons launched in the dust layer during this event on 17 and 19 June (Table 5) did confirm the presence of very large particles (> 20 µm), which cannot be reported by the AERONET particle size distribution retrieval algorithm (Hashimoto et al, 2012). In addition, observations of large particles (> 15 µm) were systematically found during all other LOAC balloon flights drifting in African dust layers, which will need further analysis to better understand the process that can maintain such large particles in suspension during several days.…”
Section: Columnar Particle Volume Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The small-radius discrepancies could be due to local variability in the dust content, like on the 27 June when AERONET retrieves a concentration increase centred on 0.25 µm in radius, and to respective uncertainties of both methods. On the other end of the particle size range, AERONET retrieval is not very sensitive to the particles larger than 7 µm in radius and the largest size class considered in the algorithm (15 µm in radius) is limited to particles smaller than about 19.7 µm in radius (Dubovik and King, 2000;Hashimoto et al, 2012). Thus, LOAC could have detected large particles that were not retrievable from AERONET observations.…”
Section: Conditions Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several long-term Sun-sky-radiometer networks operated regionally or globally, e.g., AERONET (Holben et al, 1998(Holben et al, , 2001) and SKYNET (Hashimoto et al, 2012). Several inversion algorithms (e.g., King et al, 1978;Nakajima et al, 1996;King, 2000, 2006;Li et al, 2006) have been developed based on Sun-sky radiometers to retrieve aerosol parameters, like aerosol optical depth (τ ), single-scattering albedo, absorbing aerosol optical depth (τ a , AAOD), volume particle size distribution (VPSD), and the real (n(λ)) and imaginary (k(λ)) parts of CRIs corresponding to total-column atmospheric aerosols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating the effective CRI corresponding to each VPSD bin. Here, based on the guessed CRIs of both fine and coarse modes in the previous step, we employ an internal mixing approach, following the volume average rule (Heller, 1965), to estimate the CRI of each particle radius bin:…”
Section: Separating Refractive Indices For Fine and Coarse Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%