Development of a new endosseous dental implant. Part II: Human studies

Weiss, Marvin B.; Rostoker, W.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(82)90137-8

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Porous-surfaced endosseous dental implants have been studied by others in dogs Peterson et al, 1980), monkeys (Young et al, 1979a and b;Karagianes et al, 1982), and miniature swine (Karagianes et al, 1976), and have even been used in humans (Weiss and Rostoker, 1982). Young et al (1979a and b) and Karagianes et al (1976Karagianes et al ( , 1982 also employed two-stage procedures for placing implants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

A Histological Assessment of the Initial Healing Response Adjacent to Porous-surfaced, Titanium Alloy Dental Implants in Dogs

et al. 1986

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report here the results of a histological assessment of the initial healing response following implantation into the dog mandible of a porous-surfaced, titanium alloy endosseous dental implant. Two implants were placed in edentulous areas on each side of the mandible of each dog and covered with a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap. The implant sites on one side of the mandible were allowed to head for four weeks, while those on the other side were allowed to head for eight weeks before the animals were killed. Histological specimens were obtained and assessed both qualitatively and by computer-assisted morphometry. All but one of the 24 implants were well-tolerated and healed with a variable ingrowth of bone into the porous-surface geometry. The histomorphometric measurements revealed that bone ingrowth had reached a plateau by four weeks of initial healing.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

A Histological Assessment of the Initial Healing Response Adjacent to Porous-surfaced, Titanium Alloy Dental Implants in Dogs

et al. 1986

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since then, the interface titanium‐implant (7–14) and the interactions of titanium alloys with bone (15–17) have been extensively studied. Dental implants were initially used to rehabilitate the full mandibular arch but due to the success of dental implant rehabilitations, their use was extended to rehabilitate partial (18–21) and single tooth loss (22–25).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological tooth replacement and repair*

Ferreira¹,

Magini²,

Sharpe

2007

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implantology is an ancient art that can be traced back several thousand years. Although modern implants have improved substantially over the last 50 years, the basic principle remains unchanged: replace a missing tooth with an inert non-biological material (metal, ceramic etc.). The rate of technological improvements in implants has reached a plateau and substantial new developments will require major changes to the basic approach. Rapid advances in the development of cell-based therapies in medicine suggest that similar approaches should be considered in dental treatment. The use of cell-based implants that will develop into natural teeth and the employment of cells to restore/repair caries lesions is thus an area of considerable interest and excitement.

show abstract