2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-010-0111-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a New Experimental Apparatus for the Study of the Mechanical Behaviour of a Rock Discontinuity Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We again consider this to be indicative of enhanced tensile cracking during dynamic loading and short‐lived accommodation of enforced shear along resultant asperities before deformation was focused along the pre‐weakened (“monotonic”) shear band. We also observed a reduction in shear strength to residual values at a considerably lower shear strain than in baseline tests; prolonged post‐peak strength resulting from ongoing asperity degradation observed in baseline tests was not evident in these dynamic tests, likely resulting from, relative to baseline conditions, premature asperity degradation during dynamic loading (Belem et al., 2007; Ferrero et al., 2010), consistent with greater dynamic shear strain accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We again consider this to be indicative of enhanced tensile cracking during dynamic loading and short‐lived accommodation of enforced shear along resultant asperities before deformation was focused along the pre‐weakened (“monotonic”) shear band. We also observed a reduction in shear strength to residual values at a considerably lower shear strain than in baseline tests; prolonged post‐peak strength resulting from ongoing asperity degradation observed in baseline tests was not evident in these dynamic tests, likely resulting from, relative to baseline conditions, premature asperity degradation during dynamic loading (Belem et al., 2007; Ferrero et al., 2010), consistent with greater dynamic shear strain accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The design of our dynamic testing program was informed by critical cracking thresholds that have been widely observed to be consistent across different rock types, expressed relative to σUCS (Cai et al, 2004;Lou et al, 2019). In addition, the key controls on mechanisms of deformation, and so strength and rheology, of fractured rock have been observed to be widely applicable, with a firm theoretical basis and support from empirically validated numerical models (Bahaaddini et al, 2013;Belem et al, 2007;Ferrero et al, 2010;Jafari et al, 2004;Lajtai, 1969aLajtai, , 1969bPatton, 1966;Pereira and de Freitas, 1993). Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that our key findings about the importance of the amplitude of dynamic loading and the degree of shear surface formation in generating asperities of differing character are broadly transferable to a range of lithologies and hillslope settings (Lin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Broader Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng and Yu [82] described the methods for characterising progressive damage of micro-cracks and introduced the concept of direction field of micro-crack expansion. Ferrero et al [83] described mathematical assessment of the rock-joint damage evaluated by a photogrammetric review of the discontinuity while the cyclic rock test was undertaken. Duriez et al [84] classified a continuously nonlinear formulation interaction to express the mechanical behaviour of in-filled rock discontinuities.…”
Section: Review Of the Developed Damage Models In Brittle Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic effect in this work on jointed rock need to be considered. The shear behaviour of joints under dynamic conditions have been studied by many researchers (Bakhtar and Barton, 1984;Barla, et al, 1990;Hobbs, et al, 1990;Hutson and Dowding, 1990;Jing, et al, 1993;Qiu, et al, 1993;Kana, et al, 1996;Divoux, et al, 1997;Belem, et al, 2007;Ferrero, et al, 2010;Konietzky, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Shear Strength Of Flow Bands Under Dynamic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%