2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new extraction technique and HPLC method for the analysis of non-psychoactive cannabinoids in fibre-type Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
214
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
24
214
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best combination in terms of relative area (area analyte/IS) was obtained using methanol as extraction solvent at room temperature and 2 extraction cycles of 5 min each, with a resulting total extraction time of 15 min (Figure 1). These results are in line with a recent study that investigated the use of different extraction methods (dynamic maceration, ultrasound, microwave and supercritical fluid extraction) for the analysis of cannabinoids from fibre-type cannabis varieties [38]. Recoveries calculated by comparing the concentrations of the extracted compounds with those from the MMC calibration curves at two different fortification levels showed an average recovery of 93 and 5.7% as coefficient of variation.…”
Section: Romano Andsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The best combination in terms of relative area (area analyte/IS) was obtained using methanol as extraction solvent at room temperature and 2 extraction cycles of 5 min each, with a resulting total extraction time of 15 min (Figure 1). These results are in line with a recent study that investigated the use of different extraction methods (dynamic maceration, ultrasound, microwave and supercritical fluid extraction) for the analysis of cannabinoids from fibre-type cannabis varieties [38]. Recoveries calculated by comparing the concentrations of the extracted compounds with those from the MMC calibration curves at two different fortification levels showed an average recovery of 93 and 5.7% as coefficient of variation.…”
Section: Romano Andsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Various HPLC and UPLC methods that have been reported for the analysis of cannabinoids in C. sativa L. plant samples and Cannabis consumer products, e.g. hashish, marijuana and cannabis oils, since the year 2010, are summarised in Tables and , and appraised in the following subsections.…”
Section: Hplc and Uplc (Or Uhplc) Analysis Of Naturally Occurring Canmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the pre-analytical phase has to be taken into account for method development and validation. Extraction, storage conditions, and stability determination play a pivotal role in the analysis of C. sativa L.-derived products (Dussy et al 2005;Brighenti et al 2017;Mudge et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%