2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new multiplex quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method for Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium sporogenes and Clostridium tyrobutyricum detection in cheese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently, in this study, the use of molecular techniques such as real-time PCR ensured a highly sensitive detection of C. tyrobutyricum , increasing the detection and resolution capacity in complex matrices such as silage. Our results showed a sensitive limit of detection (1.5 Log CFU/mL), in line with a previous study, in which a multiplex real-time PCR was developed to detect Clostridium species in cheese with a detection limit of ~ 1 Log CFU/mL ( Şahiner et al, 2022 ). In addition, data obtained in our validation study ( Arnaboldi et al, 2021 ) showed that MPN results sometimes overestimated or underestimated the real clostridia amount in the samples and that the difference between MPN and real-time PCR was related to the specificity of the molecular method only quantifying C. tyrobutyricum DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Differently, in this study, the use of molecular techniques such as real-time PCR ensured a highly sensitive detection of C. tyrobutyricum , increasing the detection and resolution capacity in complex matrices such as silage. Our results showed a sensitive limit of detection (1.5 Log CFU/mL), in line with a previous study, in which a multiplex real-time PCR was developed to detect Clostridium species in cheese with a detection limit of ~ 1 Log CFU/mL ( Şahiner et al, 2022 ). In addition, data obtained in our validation study ( Arnaboldi et al, 2021 ) showed that MPN results sometimes overestimated or underestimated the real clostridia amount in the samples and that the difference between MPN and real-time PCR was related to the specificity of the molecular method only quantifying C. tyrobutyricum DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%