2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a novel compact sonicator for cell disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Spore disruption, spore death, and increases in amplifiable DNA were demonstrated using B. globigii spore preparations. 4 Borthwick et al 3,8 described a flow-through sonicator using a tubular piezoceramic transducer at 267 kHz. In experiments with B. subtilis var.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spore disruption, spore death, and increases in amplifiable DNA were demonstrated using B. globigii spore preparations. 4 Borthwick et al 3,8 described a flow-through sonicator using a tubular piezoceramic transducer at 267 kHz. In experiments with B. subtilis var.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics of microbial inactivation are first order or pseudo first order Tsukamoto et al 2004;Zhang et al 2006) with (Guerrero et al 2001;Furuta et al 2004;Tsukamoto et al 2004) and frequency (Borthwick et al 2005). Tsukamoto et al (2004) showed that the rate of inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells by ultrasonic irradiation was a function of the amplitude of the ultrasonic wave and the initial cell numbers and was highest at higher amplitudes and lower initial cell numbers.…”
Section: Effects On Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsukamoto et al (2004) showed that the rate of inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells by ultrasonic irradiation was a function of the amplitude of the ultrasonic wave and the initial cell numbers and was highest at higher amplitudes and lower initial cell numbers. Subsequently, Borthwick et al (2005) reported that yeast cell disruption was greater in a novel compact 267 kHz sonicator than in a lower frequency 20 kHz probe sonicator at the same exposure time.…”
Section: Effects On Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasonic characterization for non-destructive testing and imaging usually employs a low power signal with frequency up to 70 MHz. By contrast, the power of order of 10 W is generally required in ultrasonic cleaning (Saikia et al, 2014) dyeing (Guesmi et al, 2013), food processing (Kentish, Feng, 2014), natural product extraction (Esclapez et al, 2011), microbial cell disruption (Borthwick et al, 2005), acoustic cavitation (Khmelev et al, 2015) and sonochemistry (Son et al, 2012). Moreover, applications of power exceeding 100 W are common in biodegradation (Zawieja, Wolny, 2011) and alloy treatment (Shao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%