2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a novel image analysis procedure to quantify biological porosity and illuvial clay in large soil thin sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…() and twice that obtained by Sauzet et al . (), depending on the lens used (2× or 10×). This means that the mosaics produced with different magnifications and light sources from whole soil thin sections provide more detail for the identification and demarcation of soil features than images obtained with current flatbed scanners (Jangorzo et al ., ; Bryk, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…() and twice that obtained by Sauzet et al . (), depending on the lens used (2× or 10×). This means that the mosaics produced with different magnifications and light sources from whole soil thin sections provide more detail for the identification and demarcation of soil features than images obtained with current flatbed scanners (Jangorzo et al ., ; Bryk, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FOIs or classes in mosaics or composite images were evaluated with ERDAS by calculating confusion matrices. They provide a comparison between the micromorphologist-observed (in columns or producer's accuracy) and image analysis-predicted (in rows or user's accuracy) classes (Sauzet et al, 2017). In addition, we used a Kappa coefficient criterion to assess the classification (user's and producer's accuracy) of the thematic maps.…”
Section: Assessment Of Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the application of organic manure, the clay content in the various treatments T1 (18.18 g.kg-1), T2 (18.46 g.kg -1 ) and T3 (18.89 g.kg -1 ), varied on average by 32.7% compared to the control soil T0 (8.07 g.kg -1 ). Indeed, sufficiently high concentrations of organic matter significantly limits or even stop the soil leaching process [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works have attested to soil feature characterization on thin sections as a significantly contributing tool for the understanding of pedogenetic processes, such as mineral weathering, organic matter degradation, soil structure dynamics, or particle-leaching (Stoops et al, 2010). As non-destructive methods are required, advances in image analysis procedures or the use of other techniques such as X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) have appeared over recent decades, becoming powerful ways of visualizing and quantifying soil structure (Taina et al, 2008;Sauzet et al, 2017). The use of the CT imaging method has already led to advances in our understanding of the representation and evolution of the soil structure itself, in the knowledge of structure-related pedological processes, as well as in the modelling of structural evolution (Vogel et al, 2010;Sammartino et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%