Development of a patient-centred care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundDifferent models for care pathways involving both specialist and primary care have been developed to ensure adequate follow-up after discharge. These care pathways have mainly been developed and run by specialist care and have been disease-based. In this study, primary care providers took the initiative to develop a model for integrated care pathways across care levels for older patients in need of home care services after discharge. Initially, the objective was to develop pathways for patients diagnosed with heart failure, COPD and stroke. The aim of this paper is to investigate the process and the experiences of the participants in this developmental work. The participants were drawn from three hospitals, six municipalities and patient organizations in Central Norway.MethodsThis qualitative study used focus group interviews, written material and observations. Representatives from the hospitals, municipalities and patient organizations taking part in the development process were chosen as informants.ResultsThe development process was very challenging because of the differing perspectives on care and different organizational structures in specialist care and primary care. In this study, the disease perspective, being dominant in specialist care, was not found to be suitable for use in primary health care because of the need to cover a broader perspective including the patient’s functioning, social situation and his or her preferences. Furthermore, managing several different disease-based care pathways was found to be unsuitable in home care services, as well as unsuitable for a population characterized by a substantial degree of comorbidity. The outcome of the development process was a consensus that outlined a single, common patient-centred care pathway for transition from hospital to follow-up in primary care. The pathway was suitable for most common diseases and included functional and social aspects as well as disease follow-up, thus merging the differing perspectives. The disease-based care pathways were kept for use within the hospitals.ConclusionsDisease-based care pathways for older patients were found to be neither feasible nor sustainable in primary care. A common patient-centred care pathway that could meet the needs of multi- morbid patients was recommended.

Allocation of Rehabilitation Services for Older Adults in the Ontario Home Care System

“…However, this is not how best practices and care pathways are often developed because they tend to be based on specific conditions (e.g., stroke, total knee replacement). 26 Clinical care pathways exist for rehabilitation services for some medical conditions in older adults, and they involve allocating occupational therapy and physiotherapy. 18 However, no care pathways or evidence bases currently exist for frail older persons, which makes it challenging for case managers to make decisions, especially case managers with less experience with older frail populations.…”

Continuity of Care during Care Transition: Nurses’ Experiences and Challenges

“…The discussions underline the differences of perspectives and opinions of care in hospital and municipal health care. Exchange of views and opinions provided additional insight, which is also found in previous studies [21] [11] [31]. Our nurses suggested that to create long-term goals for patient treatment and care could optimize patients' experience of continuity, including in any subsequent admissions.…”

“…However, within nursing practice, the synergism of collaboration is described as a core element [19] [20] [21]. Nevertheless, differences of perspectives, organizational structures and cultures might be important obstacles for collaboration across health care levels [21]. As such, improved communication and understanding of the opposite health care level could possibly contribute to increased collaboration between nurses during care transition [11].…”

“…Electronic documentation systems are ex-pected to accommodate some of the instrumental challenges of information exchange [18]. However, within nursing practice, the synergism of collaboration is described as a core element [19] [20] [21]. Nevertheless, differences of perspectives, organizational structures and cultures might be important obstacles for collaboration across health care levels [21].…”

When a Care Map is Not a True Predictor of Clinical Outcomes

“…Professional nurses are involved in the coordination of patient care and as such are in an ideal position to provide quality care (Rosstad, Garasen, Steinsbekk, Sletvold, & Grimsmo, 2013 genuine understanding and belief in person-centered care. Furthermore, advanced practice nurses with clinical experiences can help bridge the gap between continuing care and enhanced quality of care in older adults.…”