2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a patient decision aid on subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery: an international mixed-methods study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo develop and user test a patient decision aid for people with subacromial pain syndrome that presents evidence-based information on the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery.DesignMixed-methods study outlining the development of a patient decision aid.SettingWe assembled a multidisciplinary steering group, and used existing decision aids and decision science to draft the decision aid. Participants were recruited through social media (not restricted b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2021 study that developed a patient decision aid for people considering shoulder surgery followed a similar development process to the one used in our study 15. They conducted semi-structured interviews and online questionnaires to elicit views on what information to include, how to present the information and the acceptability of the decision aid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2021 study that developed a patient decision aid for people considering shoulder surgery followed a similar development process to the one used in our study 15. They conducted semi-structured interviews and online questionnaires to elicit views on what information to include, how to present the information and the acceptability of the decision aid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient decision aids can help patients better understand the benefits and harm of their options and be more active in healthcare decisions. 11 , 12 Clinicians often disagree with clinical research that contradicts their practice or training and over-rely on pathophysiological and anatomical reasoning for providing a test or treatment. For example, some shoulder surgeons disagree with high-quality evidence that rotator cuff repairs provide limited clinical benefit for people with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears, because they perceive a tear as something that needs to be repaired.…”
Section: Knowledge Beliefs Assumptions Bias and Uncertainty: Flawed P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some shoulder surgeons disagree with high-quality evidence that rotator cuff repairs provide limited clinical benefit for people with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears, because they perceive a tear as something that needs to be repaired. 11 …”
Section: Knowledge Beliefs Assumptions Bias and Uncertainty: Flawed P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 11 The new finding was that guideline-based advice , which provides encouragement to stay active and positive prognostic information for rotator cuff disease, decreases perceived need for surgery, imaging, an injection, a second opinion and to see a specialist, and perceived seriousness of the condition, compared with a treatment recommendation, which emphasises that treatment is needed for recovery from rotator cuff disease. 14 Prior to this, advice was recommended in guidelines 24 but without direct evidence of its benefits for people with shoulder pain. The effect of advice in our study was around two to three times stronger than the effect of labels for most outcomes, and there was little to no evidence of an interaction for any outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%