2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a PD-L1 companion diagnostic assay for treatment with MEDI4736 in NSCLC and SCCHN patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PD-L1 was analysed using the validated Ventana SP263 immunohistochemistry assay optimised for use on the automated BenchMark ULTRA® platform and samples were considered positive if ≥25% of tumour cells demonstrated membrane staining for PD-L1. 15 This cutoff was clinically validated based on the durvalumab monotherapy study in patients with NSCLC or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). 9 The only PD-L1 staining parameter that correlated with response was PD-L1 expression in the membrane of tumour cells, regardless of staining intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PD-L1 was analysed using the validated Ventana SP263 immunohistochemistry assay optimised for use on the automated BenchMark ULTRA® platform and samples were considered positive if ≥25% of tumour cells demonstrated membrane staining for PD-L1. 15 This cutoff was clinically validated based on the durvalumab monotherapy study in patients with NSCLC or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). 9 The only PD-L1 staining parameter that correlated with response was PD-L1 expression in the membrane of tumour cells, regardless of staining intensity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected cutoff for PD-L1 positivity was based on statistical analysis, distribution, prevalence, and other criteria. 15 In order to explore the antitumour activity of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in more detail in patients with <25% PD-L1 staining, the findings of this study are presented separately for patients with 0% staining, who would be more likely to be considered PD-L1 − regardless of assay or PD-L1 expression cutoff used. See appendix p19 for additional details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multiple assays with widely varying frequencies of positivity have complicated the interpretation of these data. [99][100][101] Preliminary evidence also suggests that smoking history and a greater mutational burden may correlate with heightened response to anti-PD-L1 agents, 99 …”
Section: Immunological Profilementioning
confidence: 97%
“…With consent, tumor samples taken at baseline were analyzed for EGFR mutations, including T790M, L858R, exon 19 insertion/deletion, using cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc, South Branchburg, NJ). MET gene amplification and PD-L1 expression status were analyzed using FISH (Vysis 7q31 and CEP7 probes, Abbot Molecular Inc, Des Plaines, IL) and immunohistochemical analyses, 15 respectively. Plasma samples were taken at baseline for next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (Guardant360, Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA; see supplementary Patients and methods, available at Annals of Oncology online).…”
Section: Study Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%