2009
DOI: 10.1080/00986440902938865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Precise and in Situ Turbidity Measurement System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, electron microscope measurement is costly, time-consuming, and cannot achieve real-time monitoring, nor it is possible to determine the concentration of nanoparticles [ 15 ]. Among many size measurement methods, the spectral extinction method has attracted significant attention by its relative simplicity and its ability to obtain the size and the concentration of the nanoparticles simultaneously [ 16 ]. Khlebtsov et al [ 17 , 18 ] retrieved the aspect ratio distribution of nanorods by fitting their extinction spectrum and depolarizing scattering spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electron microscope measurement is costly, time-consuming, and cannot achieve real-time monitoring, nor it is possible to determine the concentration of nanoparticles [ 15 ]. Among many size measurement methods, the spectral extinction method has attracted significant attention by its relative simplicity and its ability to obtain the size and the concentration of the nanoparticles simultaneously [ 16 ]. Khlebtsov et al [ 17 , 18 ] retrieved the aspect ratio distribution of nanorods by fitting their extinction spectrum and depolarizing scattering spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regularization may be nonconstrained or constrained. Nonconstrained regularization procedures search for solutions, which minimize the deviation from some a priori assumed characteristics, such as smoothness (solution vector norm or its derivatives are minimized), while maximizing the fit to the measured data [5,6]. Whereas constrained regularization methods impose additionally some (usually physical) constraints on the solution, which need to be satisfied rigorously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%