2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a prediction equation for the mixed dentition in a Pakistani sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
19
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(33 reference statements)
9
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination r 2 of the range of 36% to 44% was observed among the sexes revealing the total variance in canine-premolar widths that could be determined form the knowledge of the combined widths of mandibular incisors. Similar values were obtained in Thai and Pakistan populations [17,27]. Discrepancy in the values of coefficient of determination was also observed among the genders with higher values among the males as also reported in other populations [19,25] and lower values in females which could possibly be attributed to sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coefficient of determination r 2 of the range of 36% to 44% was observed among the sexes revealing the total variance in canine-premolar widths that could be determined form the knowledge of the combined widths of mandibular incisors. Similar values were obtained in Thai and Pakistan populations [17,27]. Discrepancy in the values of coefficient of determination was also observed among the genders with higher values among the males as also reported in other populations [19,25] and lower values in females which could possibly be attributed to sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Discrepancy in the values of coefficient of determination was also observed among the genders with higher values among the males as also reported in other populations [19,25] and lower values in females which could possibly be attributed to sample size. The standard error of estimate SEE was 0.79 to 0.87 for combined sexes, these lower values indicate better prediction equation and similar to values reported in other populations [17,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The arch dimensions showed sexual disparities, with the male having the larger arch dimension than in female like other investigator 50) . Side differences were reported by various researchers for maxillary and mandibular arches 31,[51][52] . However others found no significant side differences in tooth size comparison 19,28,53) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in relation to teeth size; mesiodistal [28][29][30][31] buccolingual 32) and arch dimension 28,33,34) has been done on the Pakistani population by sliding caliper but no one used the diagonal teeth dimension and digital models for such investigations [28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the mandibular permanent incisors as a predictive variable has several advantages: they erupt at the onset of mixed dentition, may easily be measured, show little variability in size, and are directly related to spaces and the management of the problems (MOYERS, 1988;BHERWANI;FIDA, 2011;RAKESH;JALILI, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%