1974
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(74)90072-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a quantitative rating scale to assess denial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
1
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a group the five items suggest a high degree of denial of emotional reaction. This is an interesting contrast from the con tent of the measures used by Hackett and Cassem [3]. In their study of heart patients in intensive care settings, high denial sug gests a somewhat boastful individual, who considers his or her body quite close to invulnerable.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a group the five items suggest a high degree of denial of emotional reaction. This is an interesting contrast from the con tent of the measures used by Hackett and Cassem [3]. In their study of heart patients in intensive care settings, high denial sug gests a somewhat boastful individual, who considers his or her body quite close to invulnerable.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Clinical ly. we have found the scale suggested for use by Hackett and Cassem [3] to be an extended clinical interview which takes at least 1 h to administer comfortably. Heart transplant patients rarely have the luxury of time for their evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Beutel, 1984], The defense mecha nisms quoted are those agreed upon by many theorists and roughly correspond to the list of Freud [1946]. Research on chronic disease, however, is mostly restricted to the single mechanism of denial [sometimes used as a generic term for other defense mechanisms, e.g., Hackett and Cassem, 1974;Weisman, 1979], Defense mechanisms arc clearly under represented at the behavioral level, whereas it is easy to think of a large number of behav ioral coping processes. It is further postulated that adaptation efforts in a specific situation occur simultaneously or successively at dif ferent levels, including both coping and de fense processes.…”
Section: Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement and identification of denial are also complex, and have not been uniform in the literature. Authors vary in operational definition of de nial, and techniques for identifying denial [9,10,13,[19][20][21]. Some criticisms of earlier studies have focused upon the label 'denier' in the absence of sufficient interview or fol low-up information [10,19].…”
Section: Problems With Denial Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%