2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2013.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a questionnaire to assess health profession students’ knowledge of older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, this score was higher than similar studies conducted among PharmD students in the US, a five-year programme compared to the 4-year bachelor’s undergraduate programme studied by Malaysian students. 18 The high knowledge score may be attributed to the geriatric-specific learning content and clinical experiential training that the participating universities have incorporated into their pharmacy curriculum. However, the knowledge scores fluctuated between the five individual institutes, likely due to the different levels of the geriatric education exposure of the various programs in those institutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, this score was higher than similar studies conducted among PharmD students in the US, a five-year programme compared to the 4-year bachelor’s undergraduate programme studied by Malaysian students. 18 The high knowledge score may be attributed to the geriatric-specific learning content and clinical experiential training that the participating universities have incorporated into their pharmacy curriculum. However, the knowledge scores fluctuated between the five individual institutes, likely due to the different levels of the geriatric education exposure of the various programs in those institutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GKAS measures geriatric knowledge in the areas of ageing disease, physical activity, drug therapy, and nutrition with scores marked as either correct or incorrect. 18 The GKAS was chosen as an appropriate instrument of measure due to its good design being a multiple-choice questionnaire rather than a dichotomous instrument. It was also a psychometrically sound instrument that assessed students’ professional knowledge of ageing in older adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge questions were prepared based on a validated 28-item Geriatric Knowledge Assessment Scale (GKAS) in the form of multiple-choice questions. 5,12 The GKAS Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient was 0.61. 12 The attitudes of MPN students were assessed by 31 Likert-scale questions prepared based on the Older People in Acute Care Survey (OPACS), the University of California at Los Angeles Geriatric Attitudes (UCLA-GA) scale, and previous literature.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,12 The GKAS Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient was 0.61. 12 The attitudes of MPN students were assessed by 31 Likert-scale questions prepared based on the Older People in Acute Care Survey (OPACS), the University of California at Los Angeles Geriatric Attitudes (UCLA-GA) scale, and previous literature. 5,7,13,14 The reliability of the OPACS-US was (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93).…”
Section: Sample Size Determination and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The failure to continue to develop geriatrics content in the PharmD curriculum has resulted in pharmacy students being undertrained in this area. 9 A study evaluating pharmacy, nursing, and physician assistant students found that only 65% agreed or strongly agreed that the gerontological content throughout their education adequately prepared them to care for older adults, which suggests a lack of self-efficacy in this area among these healthcare students. 9 (Self-efficacy is similar to self-confidence in that it refers to beliefs about one's proficiencies; however, self-efficacy is generalizable to new situations and experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%