1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness

Abstract: This is an account of further work on a rating scale for depressive states, including a detailed discussion on the general problems of comparing successive samples from a 'population', the meaning of factor scores, and the other results obtained. The intercorrelation matrix of the items of the scale has been factor-analysed by the method of principal components, which were then given a Varimax rotation. Weights are given for calculating factor scores, both for rotated as well as unrotated factors. The data for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
4,113
3
90

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7,896 publications
(4,224 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
4,113
3
90
Order By: Relevance
“…To capture the full complexity of the phenotype, we evaluated response as a longitudinal outcome. In the GENDEP study, participants' response to antidepressants was assessed weekly throughout the 12 week trial using following three measures of depression severity: the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 25 the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 26 and the Beck Depression Inventory. 27 Previous psychometric analyses of the MADRS using the GENDEP data showed this rating scale had the greatest internal consistency of the three measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the full complexity of the phenotype, we evaluated response as a longitudinal outcome. In the GENDEP study, participants' response to antidepressants was assessed weekly throughout the 12 week trial using following three measures of depression severity: the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 25 the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 26 and the Beck Depression Inventory. 27 Previous psychometric analyses of the MADRS using the GENDEP data showed this rating scale had the greatest internal consistency of the three measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the subjects were later contacted by phone or at home in order to schedule an appointment for the administration of the screening interview. The interview included a neuropsychological test for dementia, a family and medical history, a questionnaire concerning demographic, lifestyle and socioeconomic characteristics, the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly (CAPE) (Pattie, 1981), the Hamilton Rating Scale for primary depressive illness (Hamilton, 1967) and a dietary (food-frequency) questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because depression and medical illness could potentially influence basal cortisol levels, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G; Miller et al, 1992), an assessment of medical burden, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD; Hamilton, 1967), a standard measure of depressive symptoms, were also administered.…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%