2008
DOI: 10.1021/jf800216h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Lupine DNA (Lupinus Species) in Foods

Abstract: Lupine flour, protein, and fiber have become common ingredients in food products. The association of lupine-related allergic incidents with peanut allergy is a cause for concern as the latter may bring about severe reactions. In this study, a hybridization probe-based real-time PCR assay for the detection of lupine DNA in foods was developed. Particular attention was paid to the specificity of the method, which was verified by analysis of DNA extracts from more than 50 potential food ingredients such as legume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA methods for allergen detection can be considered complementary to the methods for analysing proteins, in particular ELISA. Their applicability to several allergenic foods has been extensively reviewed Demmel et al, 2008;Scaravelli et al, 2008;Monaci and Visconti, 2010).…”
Section: Detection Of Allergenic Ingredients By Dna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methods for allergen detection can be considered complementary to the methods for analysing proteins, in particular ELISA. Their applicability to several allergenic foods has been extensively reviewed Demmel et al, 2008;Scaravelli et al, 2008;Monaci and Visconti, 2010).…”
Section: Detection Of Allergenic Ingredients By Dna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, low sensitivity is not always required, and both immunoassays and DNA tests are easily able to detect approximate concentrations of target in total food. For example, many studies comparing ELISA assays and PCR-based methods for the detection of food allergens have shown a high degree of agreement (Meyer et al, 1996;Holzhauser et al, 2000Holzhauser et al, , 2002Dahinden et al, 2001;Stephan and Vieths, 2004;Hirao et al, 2006;Yamakawa et al, 2007;Bettazzi et al, 2008;Demmel et al, 2008;Piknova et al, 2008). However, PCR can also be more sensitive than its ELISA counterpart.…”
Section: Assay Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few studies comparing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of the same allergen, showing a generally good correlation for different food matrices (Meyer et al, 1996;Holzhauser et al, 2000Holzhauser et al, , 2002Dahinden et al, 2001;Hirao et al, 2006;Yamakawa et al, 2007;Bettazzi et al, 2008;Demmel et al, 2008;Piknova et al, 2008). Some PCR assays have been reported to be more sensitive than ELISA (Koppel et al, 1998).…”
Section: Dna As a Marker For The Presence Of Allergenic Proteins In Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%