2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a reference database for Ion Beam Analysis and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the incident beam energy is about ±10 keV. This was determined by using the 27 Al(p,c) 28 Si reaction at 992 keV, by matching peak positions from an Al EBS spectrum modeled using the SigmaCalc cross-section [18] at 1598 keV and by matching peak positions from an Al EBS spectrum modeled using the cross-section from [19] at 2890 keV. The incident beam energy spread is below 1 keV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the incident beam energy is about ±10 keV. This was determined by using the 27 Al(p,c) 28 Si reaction at 992 keV, by matching peak positions from an Al EBS spectrum modeled using the SigmaCalc cross-section [18] at 1598 keV and by matching peak positions from an Al EBS spectrum modeled using the cross-section from [19] at 2890 keV. The incident beam energy spread is below 1 keV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both RBS and EBS are elastic, but as the beam energy increases, the distance of closest approach of the colliding nuclei decreases until the nuclear wavefunctions effectively overlap during the interaction, and the "point charge" approximation which allows the use of the Coulomb potential for RBS is no longer valid. EBS cross-sections can be very complicated functions, but in the last decade an important subset of these have been evaluated [18] by solving Schrödinger's equation for the interaction, using known nuclear data (including nuclear energy levels from gamma spectroscopy) as well as measured EBS scattering cross-sections, which have recently been compiled into a usable database in an IAEA Coordinated Research Project [19].…”
Section: Iba Methods and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam energy is determined from the analysing magnet setting calibrated off-line using 19 F(p,αγ) 19 F resonances The spectra were analysed using NDFv9.3d. The PHD of the detectors was fitted from the calibration sample spectra by assuming an offset of zero.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross section data intended for analytical purposes, either measured or evaluated, must be verified through benchmarking experiments on well characterized targets [16].…”
Section: Benchmarking Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%