2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-020-6497-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a region-partitioning method for debris flow susceptibility mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therein, the watershed unit can better reflect the geometric attributes of debris-flow, while the area coverage of a single watershed is large, so the bias may be caused in the allocation of hazard factors in each watershed. Also, this may generate the susceptibility drawing results with only one or two units at a certain susceptibility level, which is unreasonable (Qiao et al 2021). The slope unit above can better reflect the natural conditions of debris-flow development and has a small area, but numerous small or unreasonable polygons may be generated in the flat area after completing the slope unit division, thereby leading to errors in the susceptibility modeling process (Huang et al 2020b).…”
Section: Debris-flow Susceptibility Assessment Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therein, the watershed unit can better reflect the geometric attributes of debris-flow, while the area coverage of a single watershed is large, so the bias may be caused in the allocation of hazard factors in each watershed. Also, this may generate the susceptibility drawing results with only one or two units at a certain susceptibility level, which is unreasonable (Qiao et al 2021). The slope unit above can better reflect the natural conditions of debris-flow development and has a small area, but numerous small or unreasonable polygons may be generated in the flat area after completing the slope unit division, thereby leading to errors in the susceptibility modeling process (Huang et al 2020b).…”
Section: Debris-flow Susceptibility Assessment Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%