1978
DOI: 10.3133/ofr79261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a relation for steady-state pumping rate for Eagle Valley ground-water basin, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in table 8 and by Maurer and others (1996, p. 35), the combined subsurface flow estimated from these three watersheds is at least 2,000 acreft/yr (table 7). The estimate of water yield obtained by Arteaga and Durbin (1979) for each watershed and for the entire valley is similar to the estimate of surface runoff obtained using Moore's (1968) method and, on the basis of current study results and those of Maurer and others (1996), is more representative of runoff alone.…”
Section: Estimates Of Water Yieldsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As shown in table 8 and by Maurer and others (1996, p. 35), the combined subsurface flow estimated from these three watersheds is at least 2,000 acreft/yr (table 7). The estimate of water yield obtained by Arteaga and Durbin (1979) for each watershed and for the entire valley is similar to the estimate of surface runoff obtained using Moore's (1968) method and, on the basis of current study results and those of Maurer and others (1996), is more representative of runoff alone.…”
Section: Estimates Of Water Yieldsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These differences were recognized by Worts and Malmberg (1966), who modified the relation between altitude and precipitation in estimating recharge and used the term "potential" recharge when they reported their results. The method for estimating recharge developed by Arteaga and Durbin (1978) relates mean annual precipitation to mean annual water yield and is based only on measured surface flow from the major mountain watersheds. They assume little to no subsurface flow beneath these watersheds.…”
Section: Previous Recharge Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These yields are greater than those estimated by Arteaga and Durbin (1978, p. 11), because their estimates do not include subsurface flow. Estimates of water yield reported by Arteaga and Durbin (1978) for other watersheds contributing to the Eagle Valley aquifer are based on estimated yields from Ash and Kings Canyons, thus, the reported water yields for the other watersheds also may be underestimated. Arteaga and Durbin (1978, p. 16).…”
Section: Estimates Of Water Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hydrologic report for the valley (Worts and Malmberg, 1966) included water budget estimates and maps showing water-level altitude, depth to water, and the distribution of phreatophytes and irrigated land. In the mid-1970s and early 1980s, Arteaga and Durbin (1979) and Arteaga (1986) developed a numerical groundwater flow model of Eagle Valley using estimates of groundwater recharge and discharge, and estimates of aquifer thickness and hydrologic properties. In the late 1990s, Maurer and others (1996), Maurer and Berger (1997), and Maurer and Thodal (2000) made estimates of subsurface inflow of water to Eagle Valley from the surrounding watersheds and updated estimates of groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Previous Hydrologic Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%