2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2019.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay for rapid detection of human respiratory syncytial virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study established a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic approach for the detection of SFTSV nucleic acids in clinical serum specimens. The detection limit of SFTSV RT-RPA assay was statistically estimated as 241 copies of target RNA per reaction, which is consistent with other published literature [19][20][21]. While the sensitivity of this RT-RPA assay is lower than conventional RT-qPCR for SFTSV, the detection limit is still far below the viremia level in most clinical SFTS patients [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study established a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic approach for the detection of SFTSV nucleic acids in clinical serum specimens. The detection limit of SFTSV RT-RPA assay was statistically estimated as 241 copies of target RNA per reaction, which is consistent with other published literature [19][20][21]. While the sensitivity of this RT-RPA assay is lower than conventional RT-qPCR for SFTSV, the detection limit is still far below the viremia level in most clinical SFTS patients [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The RNA extraction method used in this study to process serum sample still require much effort and heavy centrifuges, which might hamper the practicality of this assay in point-of-care settings. Magnetic bead-based methods [21] or one-step RPA microfluidics [31] could be employed to simplify the sample preparation process. In detection of clinical samples, the RT-RPA assay has a certain probability to produce false-negative results [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCoV-NL63 was even detected with 1 copy/reaction. This sensitivity of this method outperforms that of other detection methods [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RT-RPA) is nucleic acid probe based on novel isothermal amplification technique which has been widely employed to detect human RSV. The results exemplified that concurrence rates between RT-RPA assay and qRT-PCR assay for clinical samples was 96%, demonstrating that RT-RPA assay holds better diagnostic presentation on clinical samples in remote rural areas in developing countries (Xi et al 2019). Using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for common respiratory viruses and for two genes (CCL8/CXCL11) is recognized to be extremely upregulated in viral infections.…”
Section: Pcr/rt-pcr-based Immunodetectionmentioning
confidence: 87%