2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a scale for assessing the organization's safety performance based fuzzy ANP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show a positive impact of the safety climate on safety performance, i.e., consistent with the results [ 52 , 58 , 59 ]. The improvement in the safety climate means reducing potential safety threats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show a positive impact of the safety climate on safety performance, i.e., consistent with the results [ 52 , 58 , 59 ]. The improvement in the safety climate means reducing potential safety threats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Management commitment to safety and safety training make people capable of better safety performance. Eskandari et al [ 59 ] developed a scale for measuring safety performance. They considered three factors for their examination, such as the organizational factors, the environmental factors, and the individual factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational factors are the application of the OHS management system [22], [30], [49], organizational/ management commitment [31], [27], [38], worker participation [27], safety communication, continuous improvement, rules, and regulations, work accident investigation, the number of errors and omissions, number of training hours [49], [55], safety program, employee health check program, risk management (HIRADC), internal audit, safety promotion, resource procurement, safety responsibility [49], accountability and authority, and frequency and severity of work accidents [25], [32], [44], [61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP is the most widely used subjective weighting method at present. Improved methods such as interval analytic hierarchy process (IAHP) [8], fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) [9], attribute hierarchical model (AHM) [10], network analytic hierarchy process (ANP) [11] and sequence relation analysis (G1) [12] have emerged. Objective weighting methods include principal component analysis [13], entropy weight [14], CRITIC [15], etc.…”
Section: Index Weighting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%