2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-02179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Second-Order System for Rapid Estimation of Maximum Brain Strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One strategy is to simplify the model and response output. For example, several reduced-order models have been proposed, including a one-degree-of-freedom (DOF) dynamic model based on modal analysis 19 or equation of motion 20 , and a second-order model 21 . By fitting parameters of a reduced-order model against directly simulated responses obtained from a finite element (FE) model of the human head, hybrid brain injury metrics were developed to correlate with peak maximum principal strain (MPS) of the whole brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One strategy is to simplify the model and response output. For example, several reduced-order models have been proposed, including a one-degree-of-freedom (DOF) dynamic model based on modal analysis 19 or equation of motion 20 , and a second-order model 21 . By fitting parameters of a reduced-order model against directly simulated responses obtained from a finite element (FE) model of the human head, hybrid brain injury metrics were developed to correlate with peak maximum principal strain (MPS) of the whole brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fitting parameters of a reduced-order model against directly simulated responses obtained from a finite element (FE) model of the human head, hybrid brain injury metrics were developed to correlate with peak maximum principal strain (MPS) of the whole brain. These metrics have shown promise over other conventional injury metrics derived solely from rotational kinematics when correlating against MPS of the whole brain over a large spectrum of impact severities and in diverse injury scenarios on a group-wise basis 21,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These injury metrics include HIC based on head CG linear acceleration 34 and brain injury criteria (BrIC) based on head CG rotational velocity, 45 as well as other more recent studies including diffuse axonal multi-axis general evaluation (DAMAGE). 17 Human body FE models enable the study of the localized tissue response of vital organs (e.g. strain history within the brain) during an impact, which has been correlated to injury using metrics such as cumulative strain damage measure 2,46 and the universal BrIC (UBrIC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these, the 95th percentile value was recorded, resulting in a single metric of brain deformation for each of the 129 parcellated brain regions in a given impact case. The global 95th percentile MPS (MPS95) was also calculated, considering all elements in the brain, as is commonly done in FE brain injury analysis to avoid potential numerical instabilities (Panzer et al, 2012;Beckwith et al, 2018;Gabler et al, 2019;Miller et al, 2019;Sanchez et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2019a). Betzel et al (2016) performed diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) for a total of 30 subjects along with T1-weighted anatomical scans.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all computational models used to estimate brain injury risk consider the maximum deformation in the brain, regardless of where it occurs, as the primary metric that correlates to injury risk (Takhounts et al, 2013;Gabler et al, 2018Gabler et al, , 2019. While these global deformation metrics are suitable for assessing the severity of head impact, they lack the relationships that link local tissue deformation to pathological or functional deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%