Korean society ages and the birth rate decreases, the country officially became an aged society at 2017, meaning that the elderly account for more than 14% of the total population. For dozens of years, the population factor has been driving growth in Korean economy, but now it has become the greatest risk for that future of health and welfare. As the amount of medical services provided to patients increases, it is expected that in the current healthcare system, where medical costs increase proportionately, the economic burden associated with medical services for the elderly increases, and thus, sustainability issues will arise. 1 Furthermore, the elderly has various social and medical needs in their daily lives, and meeting these needs is a starting point for improving the quality of life. In addition, if the healthy life expectancy of the elderly increases and reduces the duration of disease occurrence, the medical costs associated with increasing life expectancy may be reduced. Therefore, attempts have been made to contribute to the health care of the elderly by developing an elderlycentered and citizen-centered medical service system based on the 48/6 model of care (48/6), which has already been proven to some extent. 2 The 48/6 is an integrative care initiative for improving the health outcomes of hospitalized older patients. 3 However, its applicability in community-dwelling older adults as a health screening tool has not been well investigated. In the recent issue of the Journal of Korean Medical Science, Uhm et al. 4 reviewed the concept of applicability of the 48/6 as a health screening tool, and its association with mobility in community-dwelling older adults. The authors concluded that the 48/6 is applicable to community-dwelling older adults, who show high prevalence of dysfunction in the six care areas. The authors insisted that the role of the model in screening for the health status of older adults living in the community, and in estimating mobility. However, considering the characteristics of the 48/6, it is not easy to activate the model in community. It is somewhat regrettable that this article contents are mainly about the clinical application, rather than the real value of 48/6. On this line, there are several issues need to be addressed. First, the tools applied in the study are not the full version of the 48/6, but the 10 questions, which are the short version of the 48/6, so it is appropriate to use other term, such as the Geriatric Screening for Care-10 (GCS-10) published by the authors in 2017 5 rather than the 48/6. Second, the 48/6 (or GCS-10) was originally created for the purpose of early screening of the problem within 48 hours of admission, so it should be considered whether it