2023
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.202200062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a simple substitute model to describe the normal force of fluids in narrow gaps

Abstract: Fluids in narrow gaps are employed frequently in many applications. The motivation for their use is diverse and ranges from hydrodynamic lubrication in plain bearings to the transport of hard particles into the working gap for the purpose of machining workpiece surfaces in lapping processes. Depending on the focus of the analysis, it may be useful to investigate the entire pressure field or to calculate only individual quantities. For example, in sophisticated simulations it may be of interest to know the resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When exposed to static loads, SSPs show the same force-gap height behavior as a corresponding set of SPs in the gap. For this reason, SSPs can also be used in combination with SPs or in combination with the previously published gap heightsensitive fluid force model [15]. Dynamics simulations show an increasing underestimation of the variance of dynamic quantities such as the occurring normal force between the first two bodies due to a reduced variance in vertical motion with increasing sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When exposed to static loads, SSPs show the same force-gap height behavior as a corresponding set of SPs in the gap. For this reason, SSPs can also be used in combination with SPs or in combination with the previously published gap heightsensitive fluid force model [15]. Dynamics simulations show an increasing underestimation of the variance of dynamic quantities such as the occurring normal force between the first two bodies due to a reduced variance in vertical motion with increasing sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%