2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a standardised human in vitro digestion protocol based on macronutrient digestion using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Abiotic digestion in vitro was carried out on three stages (oral, gastric and intestinal) as described by Hollebeeck et al [2013]. Briefly, the salivary step was performed at pH 6.9, 37ºC, 5 min of incubation, 3.9 units alpha-amylase/mL under aerobic conditions.…”
Section: Preparation Of In Vitro Digestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abiotic digestion in vitro was carried out on three stages (oral, gastric and intestinal) as described by Hollebeeck et al [2013]. Briefly, the salivary step was performed at pH 6.9, 37ºC, 5 min of incubation, 3.9 units alpha-amylase/mL under aerobic conditions.…”
Section: Preparation Of In Vitro Digestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature utilized for the procedure was 36 °C to approximate the human body temperature. The pH levels were 2.0 to simulate stomach chyme, 7.0 to simulate the ileum chyme and 4.5, which is the arithmetic mean of the previous values (Hollebeeck et al, 2013).…”
Section: Solvent and Process Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, great variability of pH is observed in the gut during digestion (Hollebeeck et al, 2013). In general, the pH levels reported in the literature for salivary, gastric, and duodenal digestion have presented a low variation, ranging from 5.0 (Minekus et al, 1995) to 6.9 (Lebet et al, 1998) for the salivary step, from 1.1 to 2.8 for the gastric step, and from 6.3 to 7.8 for the duodenal step (Alexandropoulou et al, 2006;Hollebeeck et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the central composite design (CCD) method can be employed to response surface methodology (RSM) and also used in investigation of a system in order to establish a statistical model between the variables of interest and the factors that cause variations [27,28]. The design of experiments through the use of CCD method has received a great deal of attention in the literature in bioscience [29,30], renewable energy [31,32], and materials engineering [33][34][35]. Thus, this method is based on a detailed analysis of a system enabling observation of the response of a dependent variable by modifying the values of two or more independent variables simultaneously [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%