Development of a technique for the real-time determination of crack geometries in laboratory samples

Abstract

Abstract.Crack size determination using electrical potentials both in service and in the laboratory has been undertaken for many years. In the laboratory this has mainly concentrated on the measurement of crack depth, with either alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) supplies. Some work to determine the varying depth along the width of cracks as an inspection tool of in service parts using mapping methods has been done. This has used both AC and DC utilising various models to understand the data recorded, in Alternating Current Potential Drop (ACPD) a range of frequencies have been used to give various skin depths.The resulting analyses have been grouped into two groups 'thin skin' and 'thick skin', in the thin skin case the skin depth is significantly smaller than the depth of the crack 1/10th of the crack depth whereas in the thick skin cases are for cases where skin depth is over this limit. Some work has been carried out to try and unify these two approaches.The work presented here looks to develop a method using variable frequency ACPD to resolve further information about cracks growing in laboratory specimens. A system has been developed to rapidly sweep a wide frequency band and record voltage drop across a crack or feature. A selection of steel samples with known geometries and features have been used to trial and benchmark the technique. These samples have a range of cross sections as well as machined features or a range of shapes and sizes to simulate a range of crack geometries. This work has been approximated using a 2D computational model. This has been done using a reduced thickness approach. 165, 09004 (2018) MATEC Web of Conferences

Potential difference methods for measuring crack growth: A review

“…Moreover, several literatures [1,10,119,145,[174][175][176][177][178][179][180] have identified the shapes and locations of cracks without pre-established calibration curves, i.e. by using non-calibration methods, through numerical simulations.…”

“…As a result, if a component, is predicted to be serviceable for a life, it is not inconceivable that a 50% safety factor will be applied to this, in order to compensate for the uncertainty. The capability of accurate, in-situ, non-destructive determination of crack geometry is therefore an important challenge faced by engineers today and is the subject of significant ongoing research activity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”