Engineering Education 4.0 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Tele-Operative Testing Cell as a Remote Lab for Material Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another very important technology for this course was the remote laboratory at the IUL [4]. With this it was possible to make the testing machine at TU Dortmund accessible via the Internet.…”
Section: B the Iul Testing Cell For Live Online Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another very important technology for this course was the remote laboratory at the IUL [4]. With this it was possible to make the testing machine at TU Dortmund accessible via the Internet.…”
Section: B the Iul Testing Cell For Live Online Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, remote laboratories have a great potential for teaching [2,3]. In order to provide the access to such kind of experiments, a remote laboratory was implemented at the Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction at TU Dortmund University [4]. For this laboratory, the iLab Shared Architecture (ISA) [5] is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terkowsky 9 ). The laboratory now has been further developed in context of the research project "ELLI -Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Science" 10 . Researchers and experts in mechanical engineering and computer science from the Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction (IUL) at TU Dortmund University and experts for teaching and learning from the Center for Higher Education (ZHB) at TU Dortmund University run ELLI in a close co-operation.…”
Section: The Remote Laboratory and Experimentation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the developed learning outcomes for laboratory learning posed by Feisel and Rosa (2005) served as an inspiration as they defined general learning outcomes, which can be reached especially by laboratory learning 17 . For our context we reformulated these learning outcomes and developed questions asking the students to assess their own level of proficiency in the respective area of laboratory work on a 10-point scale from "low level of proficiency" (0) to "high level of proficiency" (10). The following table shows the 15 posed questions (the connected learning outcome from Feisel and Rosa are indicated by the number in brackets): …recognizing whether or not experiment results or conclusions based on them "make sense".…”
Section: Individual Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%