2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00394-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Transcription-Reverse Transcription Concerted Reaction Method for Specific Detection of Human Enterovirus 71 from Clinical Specimens

Abstract: A transcription-reverse transcription (RT) concerted reaction (TRCR) method was developed for rapid and specific detection of EV71 from clinical specimens. This method was validated with EV71 strains from all of the known genotypes (genotypes A, B1 to B5, and C1 to C5), with detection limits of 10 to 10 3 copies, and was useful for identification of EV71 from throat swabs of patients with hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major etiological agent for hand, foot, and mouth disease … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, many authors have used different collection methods to identify EV (throat swab) [28], HMPV (nasal swab) [29], rhinovirus (nasal and throat swab) [30], influenza (throat and nasal swab) [31], and RSV (nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab) [19]. Moreover, Moës et al used bronchoalveolar lavage, pharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal aspirates, and sputum samples for the identification of coronavirus, although the study did not aim to compare the efficacy of sampling methods [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, many authors have used different collection methods to identify EV (throat swab) [28], HMPV (nasal swab) [29], rhinovirus (nasal and throat swab) [30], influenza (throat and nasal swab) [31], and RSV (nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab) [19]. Moreover, Moës et al used bronchoalveolar lavage, pharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal aspirates, and sputum samples for the identification of coronavirus, although the study did not aim to compare the efficacy of sampling methods [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EV71 strains SK-EV006/Malaysia/97 (SK-EV006; genogroup B) ( Shimizu et al, 1999 ), EV71/86-11316 NETH-86 (genogroup B) ( Nakajima et al, 2012 ) and EV71-GFP (generously gifted by Dr. M. Arita), which expresses GFP upon viral replication ( Yamayoshi et al, 2013 ), were used in this study. EV71/86-11316 NETH-86 was used for producing light-sensitive virus, and EV71-GFP was used in siRNA knockdown experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test is fast, with 30 min turn-around time and is easy to use by a layperson; however, each test cost around $85 and is not economically feasible for mass use. 24 Other isothermal amplification techniques were also explored including the nicking enzyme amplification reaction (NEAR), 83 , 84 transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), 85 transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC), 86 and smart amplification process (SmartAmp). 87 The NEAR amplifies DNA exponentially at a constant temperature from 55 to 59 °C.…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (Naat)mentioning
confidence: 99%