2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Versatile and Sensitive Direct Ligand Binding Assay for Human NR5A Nuclear Receptors

Abstract: The human NR5A nuclear receptors, steroidogenic factor‐1 (SF‐1, NR5A1) and liver receptor homolog‐1 (LRH‐1, NR5A2), are phospholipid‐sensing regulators of steroidogenesis, development, and metabolism. Their control of such diverse biological processes renders them attractive pharmacological targets for the treatment of several cancers and metabolic diseases such as obesity, type II diabetes, and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. However, the evaluation of candidate endogenous ligands and the development of sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous coregulator recruitment studies indicate that both RJW100 enantiomers bind LRH-1 and SF-1 34 , but ligand binding affinities have not been measured. To determine binding affinities, we utilized a fluorescence polarization-based, equilibrium ligand binding assay in which a fluorescein-labelled probe is displaced by unlabelled competing ligands 39 . Differences in probe affinity for LRH-1 and SF-1 were calculated prior to the competition assays and are accounted for in the equation for fitting the competition data (details in the methods section and our previous publication) 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous coregulator recruitment studies indicate that both RJW100 enantiomers bind LRH-1 and SF-1 34 , but ligand binding affinities have not been measured. To determine binding affinities, we utilized a fluorescence polarization-based, equilibrium ligand binding assay in which a fluorescein-labelled probe is displaced by unlabelled competing ligands 39 . Differences in probe affinity for LRH-1 and SF-1 were calculated prior to the competition assays and are accounted for in the equation for fitting the competition data (details in the methods section and our previous publication) 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine binding affinities, we utilized a fluorescence polarization-based, equilibrium ligand binding assay in which a fluorescein-labelled probe is displaced by unlabelled competing ligands 39 . Differences in probe affinity for LRH-1 and SF-1 were calculated prior to the competition assays and are accounted for in the equation for fitting the competition data (details in the methods section and our previous publication) 39 . Both enantiomers outcompete the probe, indicating that they bind the receptors in the binding pockets (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Targeting LRH-1 in UC is a particularly intriguing strategy, as its activation suppresses inflammation locally in the gut. 41,52 UC is commonly treated with corticosteroids, anti-TNFa therapies, or other systemic immunosuppressants that often cause adverse effects associated with immunosuppression in tissues other than the colon 53 . Thus, LRH-1 agonists may offer a more precise approach to UC treatment, reducing the potential for on-target, adverse effects in other tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the biological activity of this simplified 6HP series using a fluorescence polarization (FP) competition ligand binding assay recently developed in our lab 25 and a luciferase reporter assay to measure LRH-1 transcriptional activity. We assessed the binding affinity (Ki), in-cell potency (EC50), and efficacy (fold activation) of compounds 5 and 8, the direct analogs of 6HP-CA and 6N respectively, with the bridgehead group entirely removed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%