2013
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a web-based intervention for the indicated prevention of depression

Abstract: BackgroundTo reduce the large public health burden of the high prevalence of depression, preventive interventions targeted at people at risk are essential and can be cost-effective. Web-based interventions are able to provide this care, but there is no agreement on how to best develop these applications and often the technology is seen as a given. This seems to be one of the main reasons that web-based interventions do not reach their full potential. The current study describes the development of a web-based i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these approaches, design work usually begins with a user needs analysis that involves characterizing the end users, understanding their goals and activities, identifying common situations, and appreciating their requirements and preferences (Booth, 1989). Design work is becoming increasingly common in the mental health space as clinical researchers are adopting techniques such as user-centered design (Bruns et al, 2015, Kelders et al, 2013) and usability testing (Vilardaga et al, 2015) into the development process. Specific recommendations for engaging the relevant stakeholders for mental health practice, such as the patient-clinician-designer framework, provide clear recommendations about how to deal with areas specific to this domain such as recognizing the different evaluations goals of each group (Marcu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these approaches, design work usually begins with a user needs analysis that involves characterizing the end users, understanding their goals and activities, identifying common situations, and appreciating their requirements and preferences (Booth, 1989). Design work is becoming increasingly common in the mental health space as clinical researchers are adopting techniques such as user-centered design (Bruns et al, 2015, Kelders et al, 2013) and usability testing (Vilardaga et al, 2015) into the development process. Specific recommendations for engaging the relevant stakeholders for mental health practice, such as the patient-clinician-designer framework, provide clear recommendations about how to deal with areas specific to this domain such as recognizing the different evaluations goals of each group (Marcu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, more attention has been paid to the development of e-health technologies based on participatory development, co-design, and user-centered persuasive design techniques [13,[17][18][19] . A participatory design approach to develop a Web-based self-care program is rather new and has not often been put into practice in speech pathology and phoniatrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, a 3-phase development life cycle method ( fig. 1 ) was employed, incorporating end users' input with the expertise of health care professionals [16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some participants had as low as seven weeks to complete the program, which originally was intended to be used over 10 weeks. There is still a lot to be learned regarding how we best use technology to provide therapy and some researchers have used a more theory-based approach when developing digital solutions that contains therapeutic interventions (Kelders, Pots, Oskam, Bohlmeijer, & Van Gemert-Pijnen, 2013;Short, Rebar, & Plotnikoff, 2015). The use of smartphones and mobile technology in internet-based interventions is also a growing research field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%