2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11801-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model for predict trihalomethane formation potential in distribution network simulation test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ML based approaches show promise by demonstrating lower error compared to their multiple linear regression based model counterparts. 51,55,56 Additionally, Zhang et al , 2023 demonstrated that conducting a stepwise multiple linear regression for selection of significant input variables prior to ML model training allowed for more efficient training and implementation of ML model. 51 Efficient implementation of ML models is particularly useful for real-time prediction of THM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ML based approaches show promise by demonstrating lower error compared to their multiple linear regression based model counterparts. 51,55,56 Additionally, Zhang et al , 2023 demonstrated that conducting a stepwise multiple linear regression for selection of significant input variables prior to ML model training allowed for more efficient training and implementation of ML model. 51 Efficient implementation of ML models is particularly useful for real-time prediction of THM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a growing amount of research exploring the use of ML based techniques for predicting THMs. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] Most of the research uses some type of artificial neural network (ANN) based model to develop non-linear relationships between water quality variables and THM concentration. The ML based approaches show promise by demonstrating lower error compared to their multiple linear regression based model counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%