47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-1475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Aerodynamics Code for the Optimisation of Hypersonic Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial conditions that satisfied Eqs. (1) and (9) were an α 4.87 deg and a γ 0.49 deg. It was assumed that the accelerator was deployed to these conditions by the first stage booster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial conditions that satisfied Eqs. (1) and (9) were an α 4.87 deg and a γ 0.49 deg. It was assumed that the accelerator was deployed to these conditions by the first stage booster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is composed of different modules to calculate the effects of vehicle aerodynamics, scramjet propulsion, vehicle mass, and flight trajectory. The aerodynamic data for the vehicle in this study were obtained through HYPAERO [9], the aerodynamics subprogram of MANFRHAD. The performance of the vehicle can then be assessed along a trajectory by a modified version of the Computer Aided Design of Aerospace Concepts (CADAC) code [10].…”
Section: Vehicle Analysis System and Description Of Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods can be selected to calculate the skin-friction contribution to the overall drag coefficient. The first uses a strip theory approach similar to that implemented by Jazra and Smart [24], with the second utilizing previously integrated streamlines. A component build-up method is used, which is particularly necessary in the utilization of streamlines, as large discontinuities across components may result in inaccurate surface velocity interpolation.…”
Section: E Skin-friction Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a surface panel grid is shown in Figure 11. This will be discussed further when HYPAERO, UQ's panel code is introduced (Jazra, Smart, 2009). …”
Section: Meshless Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a comprehensive design tool, it has several shortcomings. These include an inability to model separation and thus high angles (8°) of attack, interaction effects between bodies or low speed flows (Jazra & Smart, 2009). This means a full aerodynamic database of the SPARTAN flyback ( Figure 10) is not possible.…”
Section: Hypaeromentioning
confidence: 99%