2010
DOI: 10.3109/17483100903387226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an algorithm for improving quality and information processing capacity of MathSpeak synthetic speech renderings

Abstract: The algorithm improves the quality and information processing capacity of synthetic speech renderings of MathSpeak. This increases the capacity of individuals with print disabilities to perform mathematical activities and to successfully fulfill science, technology, engineering and mathematics academic and career objectives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted that the synthetic speech renderings could be improved if pauses were in-serted between spoken elements of mathematical expressions. Isaacson, Srinivasan, Lloyd (2010b) developed an algorithm to insert pauses and improve synthetic speech renderings of mathematics. The algorithm was based on recordings of middle and high school teachers speaking math expressions aloud as if they were presenting them to their class.…”
Section: Origins Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was noted that the synthetic speech renderings could be improved if pauses were in-serted between spoken elements of mathematical expressions. Isaacson, Srinivasan, Lloyd (2010b) developed an algorithm to insert pauses and improve synthetic speech renderings of mathematics. The algorithm was based on recordings of middle and high school teachers speaking math expressions aloud as if they were presenting them to their class.…”
Section: Origins Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical expressions that the teachers read aloud in Isaacson, et al (2010b) were sampled from textbooks that met Indiana standards. The primary sampling criteria was that the expressions contain potential ambiguity when spoken as typical everyday speech.…”
Section: Potential Magnitude Of Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations