2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an automated scanning system for the analysis of heavy ions' fragmentation reaction by nuclear track detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar methods have been employed to separate events. Eroding the image, for example, allows a better detection of central pixels [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar methods have been employed to separate events. Eroding the image, for example, allows a better detection of central pixels [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exposure to protons, SSTDs are scored by manually counting the number of tracks, made visible through an etching process [27,28] of 90 min in NaOH 6N solution at 80 • C, on at least 20 random fields observed by a light microscope using a 32X objective, corresponding to a field area of 1.25 • 10 −4 cm 2 . Using the obtained value of the R 60 • /15 • and the count values of the spectrum at 60 • , the expected dose on the SSBD 15 • or the SSTD 15 • , and therefore the expected nominal dose given to the cells, can be calculated using the formulas:…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is determined before each experimental run. During irradiation of the samples, proton fluence and energy are measured by the SSDB 60 • .Particle fluence and beam spatial uniformity, before and after irradiation, can be also measured and monitored by means of the CR-39 detectors placed at the same position of the sample-holder (SSTD 15 • ) using a special centering tool (Figure2b).After exposure to protons, SSTDs are scored by manually counting the number of tracks, made visible through an etching process[27,28] of 90 min in NaOH 6N solution at 80 • C, on at least 20 random fields observed by a light microscope using a 32X objective, corresponding to a field area of 1.25 • 10 −4 cm 2 . Using the obtained value of the R 60 • /15 • and the count values of the spectrum at 60 • , the expected dose on the SSBD 15 • or the SSTD 15 • , and therefore the expected nominal dose given to the cells, can be calculated using the formulas:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases the track analysis process is to replace the human eye and its recognition capability, however, operator practice and training is needed even if sophisticated shape recognition method is available. Several custom made automated track counting and related software are reported in the literature, Espinosa et al (1996), Palfalvi et al (1997), Patiris et al (2006), Coppola et al (2009). A general overview on this subject is given by Hulber (2009).…”
Section: Automated Track Counting and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%