2015
DOI: 10.5937/geopan1504174s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an automated urban climate monitoring system in Novi Sad (Serbia)

Abstract: This paper presents development and implementation of an automated urban climate monitoring system in mid-sized European city Novi Sad (Vojvodina, Serbia). The urban climate monitoring network contains 27 stations (25 in urban area and 2 in non-urbanized environment). To determine the representativeness station cites we used Stewart-Oke Local Climate Zones (LCZ) classification, authors' local knowledge and field surveys to delineate urban area and surrounding environments. For LCZ determination we used Lelovic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In collaboration with related government institutions, private companies, local government, and residents, TOMACS aims to develop a predicting and monitoring early warning system of extreme phenomena, and to implement social experiments on extremeweather-resilient cities. In addition, a number of major field campaigns in different cities around the world have been conducted (1) in USA, for example URBAN 2000 (Allwine et al 2002); Joint Urban 2003 (Allwine et al 2004); Pentagon Shield (Warner et al 2007); Madison Square Garden (Hanna et al 2003); (2) in Europe, for example ESCOMPTE (Mestayer et al 2005); CAPITOUL (Masson et al 2008); BUBBLE (Rotach et al 2005); DAPPLE (Arnold et al 2004), MOCCA (Caluwaerts et al 2020), and for examples in the city of Szeged (Skarbit et al 2017) and Novi Sad (Secerov et al 2015;Šećerov et al 2019). Finally, there is still a need to harmonize collection practice, instrumentation, station location, and quality controls across cities to facilitate collaborative research (Muller et al 2015).…”
Section: Observations In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In collaboration with related government institutions, private companies, local government, and residents, TOMACS aims to develop a predicting and monitoring early warning system of extreme phenomena, and to implement social experiments on extremeweather-resilient cities. In addition, a number of major field campaigns in different cities around the world have been conducted (1) in USA, for example URBAN 2000 (Allwine et al 2002); Joint Urban 2003 (Allwine et al 2004); Pentagon Shield (Warner et al 2007); Madison Square Garden (Hanna et al 2003); (2) in Europe, for example ESCOMPTE (Mestayer et al 2005); CAPITOUL (Masson et al 2008); BUBBLE (Rotach et al 2005); DAPPLE (Arnold et al 2004), MOCCA (Caluwaerts et al 2020), and for examples in the city of Szeged (Skarbit et al 2017) and Novi Sad (Secerov et al 2015;Šećerov et al 2019). Finally, there is still a need to harmonize collection practice, instrumentation, station location, and quality controls across cities to facilitate collaborative research (Muller et al 2015).…”
Section: Observations In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Berlin city (Germany) monitoring network of the Freie University, Institute for Meteorology (FUMINET) is measuring meteorological data every five minutes for microclimate and human thermal comfort investigations. Novi Sad (Serbia) has also implemented an automatic microclimatic urban monitoring network [35,36], comprising 25 urban stations and two stations located in non-urbanized environments, collecting air temperature and humidity data every 10 minute. In its turn, the climate of Szeged (Hungary) is monitored by 23 weather stations placed in urban conditions [37] and available at http://en.urban-path.hu/monitoring-system.…”
Section: In Situ Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novi Sad, Niš, Belgrade, Leskovac -Milicevic et al, 2013;Unkašević & Tošić, 2013, 2015Savić et al, 2014Savić et al, , 2018Stanojević et al, 2014a;2014b;Šećerov et al, 2015;Bajšanski et al, 2015;Milošević et al, 2015aMilošević et al, , 2015bMilošević et al, , 2016Milošević et al, , 2017aMilošević et al, , 2017bDjukic et al, 2016;Anđelković et al, 2016;Basarin et al, 2016Basarin et al, , 2018Bogdanović-Protić et al, 2016;Djekic et al, 2018aDjekic et al, , 2018bVučković et al, 2019, Lukić et al, 2019 Slovenia Ljubljana Vidrih & Medved, 2013;Fikfak et al, 2017;Pogačar et al, 2017Pogačar et al, , 2019aPogačar et al, , 2019bPerčič et al, 2018;Žiberna & Ivajnšič, 2018 Measurements and assessment of thermal comfort and other climatological events responsible for outdoor thermal comfort were also investigated. Kovács & Németh (2012) evaluated the differences and changes of the thermal comfort conditions in the last half century in Budapest based on the measurements of two meteorological stations located in different environments (LCZs).…”
Section: Serbiamentioning
confidence: 99%