2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an efficient immersed-boundary method with subgrid-scale models for conjugate heat transfer analysis using large eddy simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A convection correction factor (Ο„) was introduced to maintain the second-order accuracy at the interface, and effective thermal conductivity was introduced to satisfy continuity of the heat flux at the interface. An explanation of how to determine each factor according to the interface configuration in the cell can be found in [25,30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convection correction factor (Ο„) was introduced to maintain the second-order accuracy at the interface, and effective thermal conductivity was introduced to satisfy continuity of the heat flux at the interface. An explanation of how to determine each factor according to the interface configuration in the cell can be found in [25,30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the performance evaluation within the design space D Γ— S, we use a full, non-linear, incompressible Navier-Stokes equation solver with subgrid-scale modeling proposed by Lee & Hwang [36]. Although the solver includes a heat transfer analysis module, which we may consider for later optimization, in this present study, we only utilize and focus on its momentum solution (i.e., drag force).…”
Section: Flow Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we use 𝑐 = 0.07, following the previous results from Vreman [45] and our a priori tests of turbulent channel flows at 𝑅𝑒 𝜏 = 180. Although several dynamic models that internally determine 𝑐 in terms of time [36,44] can be considered to improve the model's autonomy, we decided to maintain the constant model coefficient to avoid its recalculation at every time step, as it significantly increases the total computation time and aggravates the time-efficiency of the optimization.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations