2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.23.20248770
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an electronic frailty index for predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement using machine learning

Abstract: BackgroundElectronic frailty indices can be useful surrogate measures of frailty. We assessed the role of machine learning to develop an electronic frailty index, incorporating demographics, baseline comorbidities, healthcare utilization characteristics, electrocardiographic measurements, and laboratory examinations, and used this to predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transaortic valvular replacement (TAVR).MethodsThis was a multi-centre retrospective observational study of patients undergoing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible explanations for these conflicting results may be the different EF values used as a cut-off for LV dysfunction or that patients may have concomitant pathologies causing HF, such as ischaemic cardiomyopathy, which will impact on their prognosis. The main clinical implication suggested by this finding involves the necessity of early intervention in patients with systolic dysfunction, with the use of higher LVEF cut-off values to improve their outcomes [32][33][34]. Although our data showed good recovery and it did not increased risk in patients with HFrEF after TAVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Possible explanations for these conflicting results may be the different EF values used as a cut-off for LV dysfunction or that patients may have concomitant pathologies causing HF, such as ischaemic cardiomyopathy, which will impact on their prognosis. The main clinical implication suggested by this finding involves the necessity of early intervention in patients with systolic dysfunction, with the use of higher LVEF cut-off values to improve their outcomes [32][33][34]. Although our data showed good recovery and it did not increased risk in patients with HFrEF after TAVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The patients were identified from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a territory-wide database that centralizes patient information from individual local hospitals to establish comprehensive medical data. This system has previously been used by local teams to conduct population-based epidemiological studies (22,23), including the development of eFIs (24,25).…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%