2012
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422x-9-56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an ELISA-array for simultaneous detection of five encephalitis viruses

Abstract: Japanese encephalitis virus(JEV), tick-borne encephalitis virus(TBEV), and eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) can cause symptoms of encephalitis. Establishment of accurate and easy methods by which to detect these viruses is essential for the prevention and treatment of associated infectious diseases. Currently, there are still no multiple antigen detection methods available clinically. An ELISA-array, which detects multiple antigens, is easy to handle, and inexpensive, has enormous potential in pathogen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was performed to characterize the expression of JEV E protein in BHK-21 cells transfected with equal amounts of RNA transcripts. Briefly, the transfected BHK-21 cells were fixed with cold acetone and incubated with the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) 4D5, specific for JEV E protein (14), followed by goat anti-mouse IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate as previously described (12). Mutant viruses recovered from viral RNA-transfected cells (passage 0), as well as the viruses after passage on Vero cells for 5 (passage 5) and 10 (passage 10) rounds, were analyzed by plaque assays as previously described (12).…”
Section: Cells and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was performed to characterize the expression of JEV E protein in BHK-21 cells transfected with equal amounts of RNA transcripts. Briefly, the transfected BHK-21 cells were fixed with cold acetone and incubated with the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) 4D5, specific for JEV E protein (14), followed by goat anti-mouse IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate as previously described (12). Mutant viruses recovered from viral RNA-transfected cells (passage 0), as well as the viruses after passage on Vero cells for 5 (passage 5) and 10 (passage 10) rounds, were analyzed by plaque assays as previously described (12).…”
Section: Cells and Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to a single antigen serological test, a multiplex (i.e., a multi-antigen) serological test can provide the following advantages: a) simultaneous interpretation of the magnitude of response to multiple viral antigens and vaccine components (8- 11), b) differential diagnosis of infection (12,13), c) robust and quantitative measurement of antibody response, and d) increase in sensitivity due to greater coverage of immunogenic epitopes (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The increased specificity and sensitivity of printed multiplex ELISA are particularly valuable when the assay is used for patient populations and cohorts with varying severity of COVID-19 or time since infection, as mild and asymptomatic infections are associated with lower antibody titers compared to severe cases (20,21) and antibody response may differentially wane depending on the cognate antigen (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplexed ELISA platforms employ a printed array of antigens (ELISA-array) (8,9,13,14,(24)(25)(26), microspheres coated with antigens or antibodies (bead-based ELISA) (27)(28)(29)(30), or a cocktail of antigens (cocktail ELISA) (19,(31)(32)(33). ELISA-array and bead-based ELISA platforms spatially separate the antigens on a surface, whereas conventional and cocktail ELISA coat the whole surface with the same antigen(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various high throughput methods such as inkjet printing (Delaney et al, 2009) and roll-to-roll printing methods such as flexographic printing (Phillips et al, 2012), microcontact printing (Austin and Holway, 2011;Bernard et al, 1998Bernard et al, , 2000, capillary drop patterning (Delehanty, 2004) and spot and line deposition (Kang et al, 2012) have been utilized for biomolecule deposition on a range of surfaces, such as glass slides, nitrocellulose coated slides, plastics, paper and polymeric membranes. Different printing techniques that are of potential interest in biomolecule printing are illustrated in the Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%