Development of an Enteric Bacterial Enrichment Broth and Its Performance for Isolation of Clinically Significant Bacterial Pathogens from Stool

Abstract

Background: Early detection and accurate identification of foodborne pathogen outbreaks is an important public health function. Increased clinical adoption of multiplex PCR assays or culture independent diagnostic tests (CIDT) correlates to more stool specimens sent to public health laboratories (PHL) for characterization. Isolation and confirmation of enteric bacterial pathogens can prove difficult to consistently recover. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a broad-use laboratory developed enrichment broth for isolation of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia strains from stool specimens. Methods: The study compared differences in positivity rates among media and enrichment combinations at specific time points. Comparison of direct inoculation (DI), enrichment using a lab-developed Enteric Bacterial Enrichment (EBE) broth and gold-standard isolation methods were conducted to test current utility of this established practice with stool specimens heat injured and non-injured. Results: A total of 234 spiked stool samples, 175 non-injured and 59 heat injured, were tested with varying bacterial concentrations. For non-injured stools, direct inoculation performed better for Campylobacter and Yersinia than enrichment. Conversely, Salmonella and Shigella recovery and limit of detection increased with enrichment. Campylobacter had the highest percent recovery while Shigella being the lowest from direct plating at 6-hour and 24-hour enrichment periods. Among broths, EBE performed the best for Yersinia and similar to Selenite broth for Salmonella and Shigella. Generally, heat injured stool had a significantly lower percent of recovery than non-heat injured with a higher limit of detection across organisms. Conclusion: Our data suggest there is an only utility for targeted enrichment of CIDT positive Salmonella stool specimens.