2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an EvaGreen-based real-time PCR assay for detection of Aleutian mink disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CIEP was already used to identify and cull AMDV-positive animals in eradication programs [ 7 , 9 ], while the AMDVG ELISA was implemented to select AD-tolerant animals in conventional phenotypic selection plans [ 11 ]. While multiple high-throughput ELISA platforms have been developed for AD screening in mink farms with sensitivity and specificity of more than 96% and 97% [ 32 , 42 ], there are some rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), that can be used for AMDV detection and infection confirmation [ 43 , 44 ]. The main disadvantage of molecular techniques is that they have high sensitivity and specificity on samples taken from some specific organs, mainly spleen, that are not appropriate for high throughput screening and selection purposes [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CIEP was already used to identify and cull AMDV-positive animals in eradication programs [ 7 , 9 ], while the AMDVG ELISA was implemented to select AD-tolerant animals in conventional phenotypic selection plans [ 11 ]. While multiple high-throughput ELISA platforms have been developed for AD screening in mink farms with sensitivity and specificity of more than 96% and 97% [ 32 , 42 ], there are some rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), that can be used for AMDV detection and infection confirmation [ 43 , 44 ]. The main disadvantage of molecular techniques is that they have high sensitivity and specificity on samples taken from some specific organs, mainly spleen, that are not appropriate for high throughput screening and selection purposes [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multiple high-throughput ELISA platforms have been developed for AD screening in mink farms with sensitivity and specificity of more than 96% and 97% [ 32 , 42 ], there are some rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), that can be used for AMDV detection and infection confirmation [ 43 , 44 ]. The main disadvantage of molecular techniques is that they have high sensitivity and specificity on samples taken from some specific organs, mainly spleen, that are not appropriate for high throughput screening and selection purposes [ 43 , 44 ]. Meanwhile, ELISA tests can be simply performed on blood samples taken by nail clipping and are a better choice for regular farm screenings and selection strategies [ 32 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this approach was shown to have a greater detection rate compared to that of CIEP and was able to detect both American and Chinese strains of AMDV, in contrast to TaqMan based kits only recognizing American AMDV strains. Therefore, this method has been suggested to be a more reliable and specific approach to detect AMDV in mink [118]. In addition, loopmediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has also been designed to recognize different regions of the VP2 gene of AMDV, and it was shown to outperform PCR test of AMDV positive mink, making it a rapid and reliable approach [119].…”
Section: Amdv Preventative Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the PCR process, the amount of the PCR product is monitored as fluorescence intensity in real time using non-specific double-stranded DNA-binding dyes or sequence-specific hybridization probes [ 10 ]. Non-specific double-stranded DNA-binding dyes include SYBR Green, SYTO9 [ 11 ], EvaGreen [ 12 ], and BrightGreen [ 13 , 14 ]. Dual-labeled hybridization probes (such as the TaqMan ® probe) have several advantages as sequence-specific hybridization probes, particularly with regard to specificity [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%