2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42103-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an ex vivo respiratory pediatric model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia for aerosol deposition studies

Abstract: Ethical restrictions are limitations of in vivo inhalation studies, on humans and animal models. Thus, in vitro or ex vivo anatomical models offer an interesting alternative if limitations are clearly identified and if extrapolation to human is made with caution. This work aimed to develop an ex vivo infant-like respiratory model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia easy to use, reliable and relevant compared to in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Janssens et al developed the so-called Sophia Anatomical Infant Nose-throat (SAINT) model, which was derived from the CT scan of a 9-month-old girl of 10 kg [183]. Although the SAINT cast has been used as a model for premature neonates [93,186], its dimensions are markedly larger than those of these patients. Using similar approaches, Minnochieri et al developed a Premature Infant Nose Throat-Model (PrINT) from a 32-week gestational age infant of 1.75 kg [187] and Younquist et al generated a model from a head CT scan from a 26-week gestational age infant [188].…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Janssens et al developed the so-called Sophia Anatomical Infant Nose-throat (SAINT) model, which was derived from the CT scan of a 9-month-old girl of 10 kg [183]. Although the SAINT cast has been used as a model for premature neonates [93,186], its dimensions are markedly larger than those of these patients. Using similar approaches, Minnochieri et al developed a Premature Infant Nose Throat-Model (PrINT) from a 32-week gestational age infant of 1.75 kg [187] and Younquist et al generated a model from a head CT scan from a 26-week gestational age infant [188].…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the regional lung distribution of aerosolized drugs cannot be investigated with in vitro models. Interestingly, however, Montigaud et al recently described an ex vivo model of BPD consisting of the 3D-printed SAINT model connected to a sealed enclosure containing a rabbit thorax [186]. In this model, rabbit lungs were ventilated with BPD breathing patterns generated by negative pressure; lung ventilation assessment was performed with 81m Krypton scintigraphy and regional aerosol deposition was determined by coupling 99m Tc-DTPA.…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows an overview of the different types of models as well as sources from which cells and tissue are commonly derived. These include 2D cultured cells or 3D-organotypic lung co-cultures as well as ex vivo anatomical scaffolds or models derived from live tissue or 3D-printed using biomimetic materials ( Sucre et al, 2020 ; Montigaud et al, 2019 ; Möbius et al, 2018 ; Jiang et al, 2018 ; Leeman et al, 2019 ; Montemurro et al, 2006 ; Sucre et al, 2018 ; Knoll et al, 2013 ). Fetal primary epithelial cells isolated from human or rodent lung tissues can be cultured together with lung-derived fibroblasts or MSCs to study the effect of hyperoxia regarding the expression of transcription factors associated with pulmonary development.…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue equivalency is not only relevant for image quality assessment but also for accurate radiation dosimetry especially for charged particles where the tissue composition influences the particle interactions (Kostiukhina et al, 2017;Kostiukhina et al, 2019). Despite the ubiquitous existence of various thoracic pathologies and their imaging-based surgical and diagnostic procedures, more realistic models are required (Nardi et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2019;Montigaud et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%