“…Most confirmatory methods are disadvantageous due to their complex and destructive nature, such as the Takayama crystal test for blood, are not applicable to multiple body fluids, and can be labor-intensive (Greaves, 1932;Johnston, Newman, & Frappier, 2003). Identification of vaginal material and distinguishing between circulatory and menstrual blood is currently difficult due to their mixed composition (Divall, 1984;Divall & Ismail, 1983;Gray, Frascione, & Daniel, 2012). For more information regarding conventional body fluid identification methods in forensic science, see the review by Virkler & Lednev, 2009. Depending on the context of the case, some stains should be comprehensively assessed for all potential body fluids to reduce bias (Fleming & Harbison, 2010).…”