2011
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an improved field ionization detector incorporating a secondary electron stage

Abstract: Field ionization from sharp tips is attracting increased attention for use in detectors for neutral atomic/molecular species. However, the direct detection of the ionized species typically results in low sensitivities due to the small acceptance angle of the receiving ion-sensitive measurement device (usually a channel electron multiplier) and can result in sputtering damage due to the relatively high mass and energy of the incident ion species. Here we present a design for a field-ionization-based neutral ato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the sensitivity factor of best fit is 6.2 × 10 7 counts/Torr. Consistent with previous reports, 15,26 we find that α is a function of the history of the device and the channel electron multiplier and thus the absolute count rates of Figs. 2(b) and 3 are not directly comparable.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, the sensitivity factor of best fit is 6.2 × 10 7 counts/Torr. Consistent with previous reports, 15,26 we find that α is a function of the history of the device and the channel electron multiplier and thus the absolute count rates of Figs. 2(b) and 3 are not directly comparable.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…A solution to the latter was recently published by our group. 26 Most important is that Fig. 3 Time (s)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. For t < 0.5 h , the field emission is relatively unstable with both V and J fluctuating as a function of time, which is consistent with previous observations [ 25 ] and is most probably related to field-induced desorption of adsorbates, causing fluctuations in both the work function and β [ 26 - 28 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, the number of helium atoms arriving at the detector is much higher, but the very low efficiency of the present-day electron-bombardment detectors (less than 10 −5 ) makes it appear so low. Several groups are currently exploring the possibility of improving the detector efficiency with various means [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], but so far no breakthrough has occurred. The other crucial issue is thermal drift.…”
Section: Zone-plate Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%