2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-010-9126-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Improved Methodology to Assess Potential Unconventional Gas Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It considers an area with a high exploration degree as the analog area, mainly based on the estimated ultimate recoverable reserves (EUR) of production wells. It includes the FORSPAN model and its improved method from the U.S. Geological Survey (Schmoker, 2002;Salazar et al, 2010). In 2010, in Calgary, Canada, the Third International Symposium on oil and gas resource evaluation methods was held.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Total Shale Oil Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It considers an area with a high exploration degree as the analog area, mainly based on the estimated ultimate recoverable reserves (EUR) of production wells. It includes the FORSPAN model and its improved method from the U.S. Geological Survey (Schmoker, 2002;Salazar et al, 2010). In 2010, in Calgary, Canada, the Third International Symposium on oil and gas resource evaluation methods was held.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Total Shale Oil Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gary et al pointed out that much of the uncertainty inherent in shale gas reservoirs could not be appropriately quantified through deterministic analysis and hence decision making for shale gas development based on results with a deterministic method would be biased. A probabilistic method usually uses Monte Carlo simulations to simulate uncertainties which are integrated with either a volumetric method [16], rate-transient analysis [17][18][19], or numerical simulation [20,21]. The volumetric method is limited because of the poor estimation in fraction of gas-in-place that can be recovered, although the recent advancement in core and petrophysical analyses may improve this method for resource assessment [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%