“…However, comparatively few such studies were conducted on root caries lesions as researchers have generally focused on lesion creation under different conditions [Shellis, 2010;Moron et al, 2013] or the study of fluoride and/or potentially cariostatic agents on de-and remineralization of one particular lesion type in situ [Wefel et al, 1995[Wefel et al, , 2002 and in vitro [Xie et al, 2008;Qia et al, 2012]. Nonetheless, a series of mechanistic studies [Kawasaki et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2005;Preston et al, 2008] found that lesion baseline mineral distribution affects fluoride response under subsequent remineralization, that smaller lesions are more prone to remineralization and that, as shown for enamel [ten Cate and Duijsters, 1982], the mineral and fluoride content of the surface layer determines the rate of remineralization. Furthermore, dentin lesions were shown to be less susceptible to remineralization than their enamel counterparts, that comparatively more fluoride is necessary to induce remineralization in dentin lesions [ten Cate et al, 1995], that lesions progress faster in dentin than in enamel [Arends et al, 1992] and that, unlike for enamel, mineral deposition is mainly driven by lesion-bound, rather than ambient, fluoride [Preston et al, 2008].…”