2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an in vitro cholestatic drug-induced liver injury evaluation system using HepG2-hNTCP-C4 cells in sandwich configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This finding was consistent with the localization sites in human liver biopsies and rat hepatocytes [17][18][19] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5). This finding was consistent with the localization sites in human liver biopsies and rat hepatocytes [17][18][19] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was suggested that the established in vitro test system could be superior for DIC risk evaluation compared with the C ss /BSEP IC 50 (> 0.1) assessment system (Table 5). Alternatively, high-level studies have been conducted on the risk assessment of cholestasis DILI using rats (Susukida et al, 2015;Susukida et al, 2015;Oizumi et al, 2017) and human (Ogimura et al, 2017;Sakai et al, 2019a;Kawaguchi et al, 2020) hepatocytes, and various cell lines, including HepG2 (Sakai et al, 2019b;Kawaguchi et al, 2020) and HepaRG (Susukida et al, 2016), mainly in sandwich-culture. Although these bio-mimicking 3-D test systems cannot be directly compared with the present test system, the prediction accuracy of the present test system is considered to be comparable to that of reported risk predictions in spite of simply 2-D culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disruption of the normal process of bile secretion results in cholestasis. Previously, the presence of quantified BAs in the human serum was reported (Scherer et al, 2009), which 12 BAs of them have been applied in sandwich-cultured test sys-tems for evaluating DIC using rat (Ogimura et al, 2011;Susukida et al, 2015;Oizumi et al, 2017) and human (Ogimura et al, 2017;Sakai et al, 2019a;Kawaguchi et al, 2020) hepatocytes, various cell lines including HepG2 (Sakai et al, 2019b;Kawaguchi et al, 2020) and Hep-aRG (Susukida et al, 2016). Several human hepatomaderived cell lines, in particular HepaRG cells, can differentiate from an epithelial phenotype to both canalicular-and hepatocyte-like cells under two-dimensional (2-D) culture condition (Parent et al, 2004), and are widely applied for testing enzyme induction (Turpeinen et al, 2009), transporter (Le et al, 2006), toxicology (Guillouzo et al, 2007;Sharanek et al, 2017), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%