2002
DOI: 10.21236/ada411914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Infrasound Propagation Modeling Tool Kit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both models are part of the InfraMAP package (Gibson and Norris, 2002), developed and maintained by BBN Technologies. Fig.…”
Section: Long-range Sound Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models are part of the InfraMAP package (Gibson and Norris, 2002), developed and maintained by BBN Technologies. Fig.…”
Section: Long-range Sound Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the following sections we highlight some features of infrasonic propagation from SP. In addition to ray--tracing, we use an implementation of the frequency--domain Parabolic Equation (PE) method (Gibson and Norris, 2002) in order to investigate low--frequency effects, i.e., diffraction and scattering. In the following sections our modeling efforts are restricted to propagation between SP and IS44, the closest recording station.…”
Section: Propagation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate the importance of diffraction and scattering on infrasonic propagation from SP to IS44 using the PE software InfraMap (Gibson and Norris, 2002). Diffraction arises simply from using a more complete description of the acoustic wavefield (i.e., the PE method vs. ray--tracing).…”
Section: Parabolic Equation (Pe) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it becomes possible to test various upper wind/atmospheric models by comparing arrival times with the predicted residuals. The raytracing was performed using both the InfraMAP software (Gibson et al, 1999) and Supracenter (Edwards and Hildebrand, 2004) software, to delimit the source regions and geometry of the observed airwaves. In general, we found almost no difference in the predicted arrival times using these two different software tools-in what follows we show only the Supracenter solution, noting that the InfraMAP solutions are virtually identical.…”
Section: Ray-tracing Determination Of Acoustic Source Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%