Development of an initial lexicon for and impact of forms (cube, liquid, powder) on chicken stock and comparison to consumer acceptance

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to develop an initial descriptive sensory lexicon of commercial chicken stock products, determine the flavor profile and groupings of various forms of chicken stock, and understand consumer acceptability of chicken broth. Nine trained panelists evaluated 10 samples and consumers evaluated 6 of these 10 samples. The lexicon consisted of 23 sensory attributes, including 5 for appearance, and 18 for flavor. Cube type samples had high saltiness intensity, powder type had moderate saltiness and higher chicken flavor intensity, and liquid type had low saltiness and chicken flavor intensity. As results from overall acceptability and JAR ratings, consumer evaluation was not affected by type of chicken stock, and appropriateness (just about right) of chicken flavor and saltiness intensities were important for consumer acceptability.Chicken flavor and saltiness might be important drivers of consumer liking for chicken stock products. Practical applicationsAlthough chicken stock products are widely used, research on their use as bases in preparing dishes is limited. This study developed a lexicon for chicken stock products and conducted a consumer acceptability evaluation of chicken broth. The findings from this study can help manufacturers develop and improve chicken stock products by modifying flavor attributes to increase consumer acceptance. For consumers, chicken flavor was more important than saltiness for acceptability.

Novel Fortified Blended Foods: Preference Testing with Infants and Young Children in Tanzania and Descriptive Sensory Analysis

“…The panel consisted of five highly trained panelists who had 120 hr of general descriptive analysis training, and over 2000 hr of evaluation experience with a wide array of food products, including cereal-base products. Similar panels have been used in other studies where highly trained, reproducible panelists are desired (Chambers, Jenkins, & Garcia, 2017;Chanadang et al, 2016;Jaffe, Wang, & Chambers, 2017;Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2017;Maughan, Chambers, & Godwin, 2016). Thirty attributes including aroma, flavor, texture, and appearance terms were used to describe samples.…”

Lexicon for multiparameter texture assessment of snack and snack‐like foods in English, Spanish, Chinese, and Hindi

“…Throughout the study a product frame of reference was collected to generate terms, followed by review of references, examples and determining the final descriptor list. Similar methodology has been used in other recent studies (see e.g., Chambers et al, 2017;Griffin, Dean, & Drake, 2017;Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2017;Belisle, Adhikari, Chavez, & Phan, 2017).…”

Sensory Shelf Life Estimation of Novel Fortified Blended Foods Under Accelerated and Real‐Time Storage Conditions

“…At each time point, descriptive sensory analysis was conducted to evaluate aromas and flavors of all samples using six highly trained panelists of the Center for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior at Kansas State Univ. Similar panels have been used for FBFs and recent studies of other products (Alexander, de Beer, Muller, van der Rijst, & Joubert, 2017;Belisle, Adhikari, Chavez, & Phan, 2017;Chambers et al, 2016;Gaudette & Pietrasik, 2017;Jaffe, Wang, & Chambers, 2017;Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2017;Koppel & Koppel, 2018). The panelists used in this study had more than 4 months of descriptive panel training; more than 2000 hr of sensory testing experience, including many types of grain products; and were oriented to this project in four 1.5 hr sessions.…”