2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-009-9173-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Instrument for Assessing Undergraduate Science Students’ Perceptions: The Problem-Based Learning Environment Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…83-100% of students in the teacher support dimension, 88-96% of students considered the good quality of the problem given and 100% of the students evaluated positively the dimension of student interaction and collaboration. Analyzing the responses to the questionnaire the average of the total score obtained by each student was 89 ± 16, which is in accordance with the interval defined previously by others corresponding to a minimum score of 23 and a maximum score of 115 (Senocak, 2009). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…83-100% of students in the teacher support dimension, 88-96% of students considered the good quality of the problem given and 100% of the students evaluated positively the dimension of student interaction and collaboration. Analyzing the responses to the questionnaire the average of the total score obtained by each student was 89 ± 16, which is in accordance with the interval defined previously by others corresponding to a minimum score of 23 and a maximum score of 115 (Senocak, 2009). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At the end of the class, students were asked to respond to a questionnaire in order to evaluate their perceptions about the PBL environment in class, regarding some dimensions, according to Senocak (2009), such as: teacher support (the extent to which the teacher acts a facilitator or metacognitive coach and supports several of the goals of PBL), student interaction and collaboration (the extent to which problems act as stimulus and PBL starts with an ill-structured problem to be solved) and the quality of the problem (extent to which problems act as stimulus and PBL starts with an ill-structured problem to be solved).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From here, this paper explores literature related to survey development and procedures used to ensure the validity and reliability of survey instruments. This process is divided into four distinct stages based on the work of Senocak (2009): item formulation, content validation, reliability calculation, and construct validation. To further strengthen these procedures Rasch modelling (Bond and Fox 2007;Rasch 1960) techniques were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide insights about existing tools as well as details about how our instrument addresses a gap in designing and assessing learning experiences, which is lacking from these tools. Specifically, existing instruments focus on assessing student learning experiences rather than assisting educators with being able to design and assess whether they have achieved creating holistic learning experiences for their students [16][17][18][19][20][21] . Existing survey instruments may assess concepts related to Perkins' principles as well as correlating constructs.…”
Section: Preliminary Review Of Existing Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adds breadth examining the application of these principles, but does not provide clarity regarding how to design or assess learning experiences for these aspects. 20 metacognitive questions.…”
Section: Preliminary Review Of Existing Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%