2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an online-SPE-LC-MS method for the investigation of the intestinal absorption of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PHIP) and its bacterial metabolite PHIP-M1 in a Caco-2 Transwell system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The toxicological relevance of the transformation of PhIP to PhIP‐M1 depends on uptake potential and relative toxic potencies. PhIP and PhIP‐M1 were shown to be transported at similar rates in several in vitro systems (Nicken et al ., 2010; 2015; Willenberg et al ., ). The mutagenic potency of PhIP‐M1 in the Ames test was only 5% that of PhIP, and the adverse response was speculated to be attributable to residual PhIP (Vanhaecke et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The toxicological relevance of the transformation of PhIP to PhIP‐M1 depends on uptake potential and relative toxic potencies. PhIP and PhIP‐M1 were shown to be transported at similar rates in several in vitro systems (Nicken et al ., 2010; 2015; Willenberg et al ., ). The mutagenic potency of PhIP‐M1 in the Ames test was only 5% that of PhIP, and the adverse response was speculated to be attributable to residual PhIP (Vanhaecke et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Up to now, it is unclear which transporter is involved in the PhIP efflux in the rat colon. Various research groups have shown that the breast cancer resistance protein, the multidrug resistance protein 2 and P-glycoprotein are involved in PhIP transport in various species (Walle and Walle 1999;Dietrich et al 2001;van Herwaarden et al 2003;Willenberg et al 2015), but their involvement could not be confirmed in previous Ussing chamber experiments with gut tissue samples of male Fischer 344 rats (Nicken et al 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PhIP quantification was carried out by LC-MS with an automated sample preparation by on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) in the backflush mode as described by Willenberg et al (2015). Briefly, two LC-10-ADvp LC systems (Shimadzu, Langenfeld, Germany) including 2 SCL10Avp controllers, 4 pumps (LC-10ADvp or LC-10AD), a column oven (CTO-10ASvp) set to 40 °C, two degassers (DGU-14A) and a high-pressure 2 position Cheminert sixport two-position valve (VICI, Schenkon, Switzerland) were used.…”
Section: Quantification Of Phipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24, 25 Cell monolayers that exceeded a resistance of 300 Ω cm −2 were incubated with either 1 μM or 10 μM of TPPU solution in DMSO on the apical side. Medium samples on the apical and basolateral side were collected and frozen immediately after 1, 3 and 6 hours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent permeability coefficient (P app ) was calculated for t = 1 h as described. 2427 In order to assure that TPPU does not compromise the integrity of the monolayer additional experiments were performed in the presence of Lucifer yellow (LY; 100 μM in the apical compartment), a marker for paracellular diffusion and no LY could be detected in the basolateral chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%